As has happened in all the lawsuits that atheists and others have brought against the National Motto, the trial court threw out Mayle’s lawsuit. And, following the atheists’ example, Mayle appealed his case to a federal appellate court, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. With your support, the ACLJ filed a critical amicus brief urging the appellate court to affirm the lower court’s ruling.
Our brief argued that none of Mayle’s rights under the First Amendment are infringed by seeing the national motto on the currency. Placing the national motto on currency does not force Mayle to do anything. The national motto is the government’s message, and no one would attribute that message to Mayle or to any other person who happens to carry money.
The Court of Appeals agreed, holding that the national motto burdened neither Mayle’s free exercise nor his free speech clause rights because he was not compelled to do anything. The court said:
No one walking down the street who saw Mayle would have the faintest idea what Mayle had in his pocket—currency or plastic payment cards or perhaps just a smart phone. The government has thus not coerced Mayle into advertising, supporting or participating in religion; it has merely included on its currency the religious heritage of the country along with other traditions.
In affirming the lower court’s decision to dismiss Mayle’s case, the court concluded by noting that it was “joining every other court” in upholding the constitutionality of the national motto.
For the original article, visit aclj.org.
(Source: ACLJ via Charisma Media)